Evidence library

How to submit a record for review

A useful submission is a source package, not a performance headline. The audit desk needs enough context to identify the claim, inspect the period, and explain the boundary of any public record.

Include the claim scope

State the preferred display name, whether the record is personal, competition, model, or product evidence, the covered dates, account or division, base currency, and which metrics you want checked.

Send source material safely

Provide statements, administrator links, competition records, or timestamp receipts through an agreed channel. Never send broker passwords, API keys, recovery codes, or unrestricted account access. Redact unrelated personal information where it does not affect verification.

Expect questions

The review may ask about deposits, withdrawals, open positions, account transfers, benchmark definitions, missing months, or a difference between a headline return and the reconstructed series. A question is not a rejection; it is how claim scope is kept honest.

Publication is conditional

A submitted package can be declined, published with limitations, or corrected later. AuditedTrader does not publish synthetic sample identities as audited traders, and a product or customer-performance claim needs evidence that actually covers that product or customer population.

These pages describe the registry's evidence boundary. They do not turn historical evidence into financial advice or a promise of future performance.

Questions about a package can be sent to audit@auditedtrader.com.